Independent practitioner`s report on a limited assurance engagement on non-financial reporting

Independent practitioner`s report on a limited assurance engagement on non-financial reporting 1)

To Deutsche Bahn AG, Berlin

We have performed a limited assurance engagement on the disclosures made in the sections “To our Stakeholders – Open Stakeholder Dialog”, ­“To our Stakeholders – Charitable Commitment by the Deutsche Bahn Foundation” and the sections highlighted with a gray background and titled “FURTHER INFORMATION” of the Integrated Report 2022 of Deutsche Bahn AG, Berlin, (hereinafter the “Company”) for the period from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022 (hereinafter the “Report”).

Not subject to our assurance engagement are the external sources of documentation or expert opinions mentioned in the Report.

Responsibility of the Executive Directors

The executive directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the Report in accordance with the principles set out in the Sustainability Reporting Standards of the Global Reporting Initiative (hereinafter the “GRI criteria”).

This responsibility includes the selection and application of appropriate non-financial reporting methods and making assumptions and estimates about individual non-financial disclosures of the Company that are reasonable in the circumstances. Furthermore, the executive directors are responsible for such internal control as the executive directors consider necessary to enable the preparation of a Report that is free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.

Independence and Quality Control of the Audit Firm

We have complied with the German professional provisions regarding ­independence as well as other ethical requirements.

Our audit firm applies the national legal requirements and professional standards – in particular the Professional Code for German Public Auditors and German Chartered Auditors (“Berufssatzung für Wirtschaftsprüfer und vereidigte Buchprüfer”: “BS WP/vBP”) as well as the Standard on Quality Control 1 published by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (Institute of Pub-lic Auditors in Germany; IDW): Requirements to quality control for audit firms (IDW Qualitätssicherungsstandard 1: Anforderungen an die Qualitätssicherung in der Wirtschaftsprüferpraxis – IDW QS 1) – and accordingly maintains a comprehensive system of quality control including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Responsibility of the Assurance Practitioner

Our responsibility is to express a conclusion with limited assurance on the disclosures in the Report based on our assurance engagement.

We conducted our assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised): Assurance Engagements other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information, issued by the IAASB. This Standard requires that we plan and perform the assurance engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether any matters have come to our attention that cause us to believe that the disclosures in the Company’s Report, other than the external sources of documentation or expert opinions mentioned in the Report, have not been prepared, in all material aspects, in accordance with the relevant GRI criteria.

In a limited assurance engagement the procedures performed are less extensive than in a reasonable assurance engagement, and accordingly ­
a substantially lower level of assurance is obtained. The selection of the assurance procedures is subject to the professional judgement of the assurance practitioner.

In the course of our assurance engagement, we have, amongst other things, performed the following assurance procedures and other activities:

  • Gain an understanding of the structure of the Company’s sustainability organisation and stakeholder engagement
  • Inquiries of the executive directors and relevant employees involved in the preparation of the Report about the preparation process, about the internal control system relating to this process and about selected disclosures in the Report
  • Identification of likely risks of material misstatement in the Report
    under consideration of the GRI criteria
  • Review of processes for the collection, control, analysis and aggregation of selected data from different locations of the Company on a sample basis
  • Analytical procedures on selected disclosures in the Report
  • Reconciliation of selected disclosures with the corresponding data in the financial statements and management report
  • Inquiries on the relevance of climate-risks
  • Evaluation of the presentation of the Report

Assurance Opinion

Based on the assurance procedures performed and evidence obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the disclosures in the Company’s Report for the period from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022 have not been prepared, in all material aspects, in accordance with the relevant GRI criteria. We do not express an assurance opinion on the external sources of documentation or expert opinions mentioned in the report.

Restriction of Use

We draw attention to the fact that the assurance engagement was conducted for the Company’s purposes and that the report is intended solely to inform the Company about the result of the assurance engagement. Consequently, it may not be suitable for any other purpose than the aforementioned. Accordingly, the report is not intended to be used by third parties for making (financial) decisions based on it. Our responsibility is ­
to the Company. We do not accept any responsibility to third parties. Our assurance opinion is not modified in this respect.

Berlin, 7 March 2023

PricewaterhouseCoopers GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Hendrik Fink
Wirtschaftsprüfer
(German Public Auditor)

ppa. Nicola Jung

1) PricewaterhouseCoopers GmbH has performed a limited assurance engagement on the German version of the report and issued an independent practitioner’s report in German language, which is authoritative. The following text is a translation of the independent practitioner’s report.

Where would you most likely position yourself?How do you like our digital report?Thank you for your participation!

Where do you see room for improvement?

Sustainability indices

Filter report by: